Is it time to impose a levy on house?

As planned, Law on House and Land Tax will be reviewed and adopted by the National Assembly at its 7th Meeting (held in May 2010) and will be effective from 1 January 2012.

However, according to Head of Economy Committee of the National Assembly, Mr. Ha Van Hien, many delegates of the National Assembly have yet to “agree” on the levy on houses. From Mr. Hien’s explanation, during the construction of a house, construction materials have to be levied, and an amount of money has to be paid for the use of the land; therefore, the levy on houses will lead to an overlap against multiple taxes.

The authorities in charge of drafting and verifying the law in question maintain their viewpoint

Notwithstanding Mr. Hien’s explanation, the National Assembly’s Budget and Finance Committee (the one verifying the draft Law on House and Land Law) and the authority drafting such law maintain their viewpoint that houses should be levied on the reason that imposing a levy on houses will help to enhance management work as well as gradually and reasonably control and regulate payments into the state budget. The collection of taxes on houses also helps to limit speculation in houses, especially condominiums. Since the tax rate proposed in the draft law is not high, and subjects on which the levy will be imposed are narrowed, the majority of citizens have yet been affected by such law. In addition, the application of tax on houses will not result in an overlap among tax types for taxes on houses, and land is considered as a tax on property which is independent from other tax types.

The National Assembly’s Budget and Finance Committee has proposed two solutions: the first solution is only collecting house taxes against second houses or houses thereon owned by the same person at the rate of 0.03%. This solution helps to assure each citizen a house. The second solution is to impose a levy on the first house but the house’s value subject to house tax will be increased up to 1 billion dong instead of 500 million dong as proposed in the draft Law on House and Land Tax submitted to the National Assembly. With this solution and from the calculation of the Minister of the Ministry of Finance, Mr. Vu Van Ninh, the majority of people having houses in rural and urban areas of 400m2 for Level I houses or more or Level II houses will be excluded from paying this tax.

Concerns still remain

Nevertheless, the Standing Deputy Head of the Bar Association of Ha Noi City, Mr. Nguyen Hong Tuyen, following careful review of the 15 articles in this draft law, commented that the drafters have not taken today’s citizens’ living standards and conditions into consideration. One of the purposes of constructing this law is to restrict the speculation in houses and land, yet there are few provisions that “target” speculators as opposed to citizens. Agreeing with this opinion, Dr. Tran Du Lich, Deputy Group Leader of the National Assembly’s delegation of Ho Chi Minh City and economic expert, asserted that imposing tax on houses may not be implemented for the time being – perhaps not even in 10 years’ time – since the annual average income of citizens still stands low at approximately US$1,000.

Following analysis of these two solutions proposed by the National Assembly’s Budget and Finance Committee, Head of the Committee for People’s Aspiration, Mr. Tran The Vuong, still has many concerns. In his opinion, the first solution will soon show its impracticality when some people only own one house but its value is ten times the value of other houses. Regarding the second solution, a housing tax based on house values will lead to many complicated problems. For example, “what will happen if House A is valued at 1 billion dong early that year but its value drops down to 700 million dong later in the same year due to the then frozen real estate market? My concern is that there will be a lot of complaints when this law is applied.”

The National Assembly’s Head of Economy Committee, Mr. Ha Van Hien, expressed: “Our people’s livelihood is still low and officers’ incomes are low too; therefore, it is essential to limit payments…”

In order to reasonably settle the collection of tax on houses and lands, Dr. Le Net, Founding Partner of LNT & Partners Law Firm, recommended that the State should only collect housing tax from the commercial realm to restrict the speculation in houses and lands. Particularly, heavy taxes should be imposed on those who buy and sell houses repeatedly. The closer the period between selling and buying, the higher the tax rate should be. For example, someone owns land and wants to sell it immediately for profit. To limit these types of purely commercial transactions, the State may possibly impose a heavy levy on the first transfer thereof within 1 year (i.e., 50% of the discrepancy between selling and buying prices). The rate shall be 30% for the second year’s transaction and shall be reduced on a yearly basis. If this succeeds, trading in houses and lands in such a “sliding” manner will certainly be decreased. The collection of tax on houses on a large scale from the second house or more should only be carried out in the future when the citizens’ livelihood has been improved. Upon application of the Law on Personal Income Tax (PIT), houses have become a type of property made from the disposable income of each individual after PIT. If any levy is imposed on the only house, “the overlap among tax types” is inevitable. For the collection of tax from the second house or more, however, the houses’ areas should not be used for tax calculation. Instead, such collection should be based on a particular location of each house. This is because for houses in Vietnam in general, especially those in urban areas, the location of a house will decide its value. A 100-square meter house on Hang Dao Street, Hoan Kiem District, Ha Noi will certainly cost approximately similar to ten similar houses in Dong Anh district.

Issues about houses and land as property are sensitive as they directly affect every citizen. Therefore, the application of an additional tax will probably causes disagreements. What is more, it is a proven fact that controlling housing areas and valuation for tax calculation is quite complicated, while conditions for implementing them are not available. For this reason, it is preferable to collect tax on land first, not houses. This also reflects the opinion of the Vice President of Vietnam Fatherland Front Committee of Ha Noi City, Mr. Dang Viet Quan.

By Vietnam Law Insight, LNT & Partners.

Disclaimer: This Briefing is for information purposes only. Its contents do not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as detailed advice in individual cases. For more information, please contact us or visit the website: Http://

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s